Advertising
Logitravel (P)

Obama and the War on Drugs

When he takes office in a few weeks, Obama must address the growing violence in Mexico. This Los Angeles Times editorial suggests dealing with the use of hard drugs at home.

Obama

The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan takeover of the president's attention as soon as Obama takes office, but should also make time for war on our borders, in which the Mexican government is opposed to drug traffickers. In Mexico in the past two years, drug-related violence has claimed over 6,800 lives, and has introduced dozens of American cities that are markets for illicit drugs. This war is as ugly as the others, with beheadings, kidnappings and clashes in the town that threaten Mexico's stability and U.S. national security.
The cost is staggering, as the Times reporters have documented: 1,300 killed in Ciudad Juarez so far this year, and 350 killings in Tijuana since September. In Mexico City the drug-related corruption has reached the highest levels of the police, the most important narcotics chief of the country was on the payroll of drug traffickers. And in the suburbs of San Diego, alleged members of a Tijuana drug gang have been charged with at least a dozen murders and twenty kidnappings in the past three years.

Forbes magazine recently asked whether Mexico was a failed state because of its inability to stem the flow of blood and drugs. The state is weak, but failed. After seventy years of party rule, the executive and legislative branches are evolving, and the country is trying to build an independent judiciary. The problem is that President Felipe Calderon is struggling to regain control of the posters before end corruption and impunity. Not yet been fully established strong law enforcement and the rule of law.

The war on drugs is a bilateral problem. According to a recent report by the Brookings Institution, about two thousand firearms enter daily into Mexico from the United States. Drug use in the United States has not disminudo so important in the last quarter century, with a total of six million users of heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine. Although it has risen slightly since Calderon began his offensive last year, the price of cocaine on the street is, however, one third of its value in 1990, indicating a steady supply through the Mexican smuggling routes.

The United States will agree that Calderon win the war, because a failed state in Mexico would mean chaos at the border and immigration, among other consequences. Under the so-called Merida Initiative, the U.S. must provide Mexico with $ 1.4 billion in equipment and training interception in the next three years. Last week it reached an agreement on the first delivery expected in January. This should be accompanied by close cooperation between U.S. and Mexican law enforcement agencies. The Obama administration should increase its efforts to intercept shipments of money, chemicals for methamphetamine production and high-powered weapons to the north. Some weapons come from armories and legal holidays, but Mexican officials say that other items are illegal aliens, apparently deposits of United States Army and National Guard. Finally, the U.S. must seriously address drug use while providing prevention and treatment programs. After all, it is demand that sustains drugs.

December 14, 2008 © Los Angeles Times

Radical Party