Four TV, misinformation by flag
The television channel Cuatro has been worn with this crap of "21 days smoking dope" made for the chain by Samanta Villar .
What is most frightening to these programs is that pamphlet is preparing justifications by the Socialist Party of Spain to apply new measures against cannabis and its consumers be the program four days a TV 21 stone in prohibitionist campaign of harassment and demolition. This program seemed pathetic, reactionary, retrograde, sensational, unfocused, tabloid, absurd, ridiculous ... and a lot of adjectives that will save us from dumping.
Would have to think bad (and certainly acertaremos as the press is there to support this particular print) and glimpse behind this program and other related media capitalism to socialism there is a real campaign to tighten further if possible penalties and forfeitures (for example use the helicopter to detect crop in Navarra, or try a consumer endorsarle cannabicultor surreal crime in prison for two pots of marijuana). The manipulation of information of this program is more than evident (21 days), the smell of a new reactionary socialism is hopeless.
This chain, this lady (say) have scoffed at the hearing and those who interviewed and used (in the pejorative sense of the word). I would like to know much about the opinion of Mr, Escohotado or Fernanda.
Have opened in the same chain a series of forums opinion on this program. Mention also discussed the program as noted in these same forums Four, NOT DONE IN 21 DAYS , it seems to be that clearly do not match dates of events that were in the program. Liars, manipulators and shameless. From War on Drugs info and seeing the look-out war for consumers and growers wonder what they think of this association and whether they plan to take action and of course, of course, that of the socialist stoners .
Then we leave the statement of Martin Barriuso that no deseperdicio.
Luckily we have internet.
Communique FAC (Federation of Cannabis Associations)
Imagine that a "journalist" looking forward to climbing and unscrupulous professionals devote three weeks to get massive doses of alcohol on the body: A few glasses of marc at breakfast, a few shots of whiskey at midmorning, three liters of Rioja as an aperitif and thus excess after excess, to the alcoholic coma. Imagine also the so called "journalist" to insist on doing their "job" in full chant. The result undoubtedly would be regrettable. If, on top of sensationalism, the above attempt to draw deep conclusions about the dangers of drinking and dedicated to give ground to former supporters of introducing alcohol Prohibition as a way of coping with excessive consumption, it is clear that no one taken seriously.
However, the program "21 days smoking dope" , issued on Friday 27 March at Four, Samanta Villar, the intrepid "journalist" does exactly that, only changes the alcohol cannabis. In fact, these past Villar sticks with joints that certainly would have died of alcohol overdose if he had attempted a similar program about drinking. The question that immediately arises is: Can you call journalism irresponsablidad similar exercise?
Four program was a classic sign of manipulation and anti-drug propaganda in the most old-fashioned style. It altered the order of events (the buzz brutal Dutch, for example, there was several weeks before shooting the rest), and removed several days of recorded material (such as visits to the association MACA Barcelona) so that everything fit in predetermined script. Political messages were deleted from the Cannabis Associations and gave excessive weight to a small group of former addicts who do not represent anywhere near the reality of most people who smoke pot.
Moreover, the contribution of the program the necessary public debate on cannabis, its benefits and risks, and their legal status is simply expendable. What cannabis is not harmless? Already knew that. What excesses are bad? Go novelty. What about people who had better not try the joints in your life? This is what we say lifetime. Is that what that noise? Is that all that Four is capable of contributing to a debate so serious?
Fortunately, not all who use cannabis commit the stupid excesses of Four journalist. The vast majority of people who use the plant are normal people and we have serious problems due to our consumption. But above all, we tend to be people responsible facing the consequences of what he does. Instead, the painful final image of Samanta Villar, swearing that after the brutal cannabis binge had just hit, never again to smoke a joint, inevitably evokes the typical idiot who, after disregard the advice of the world and get drunk to the legs, said in the morning, in full hangover, you'll never want to drink. Luckily, everyone knows the little value they have the reflections of a hungover idiot.
The current drug policies are a disaster that causes more harm than the drugs themselves, as recently acknowledged the European Commission in a recent report. The current legal regulation of cannabis, as well as feed a huge black market mafia nature and deteriorate the quality of product, restrict freedom of millions of adults and hinders access to patients who could benefit from its medicinal properties, without getting change prevent the access of adolescents to substance. The reform of the legal framework is a matter of great social significance and must be addressed seriously, based on sociological and scientific data, not on prejudices and experiences of a few professionals from deception and trash TV.
D. Martin Barriuso.
Chairman of the FAC
We can see the complete program in this playlist you have created and extracted from youtube.

















April 22, 2009 at 12:17
The 'socialist stoners' and we believe in his day, for two reasons:
Neurons '21 ': http://www.rosasverdes.com/?p=625
'21 Neurons. The return ': http://www.rosasverdes.com/?p=848
Regards
June 3, 2011 at 17:51
This article seems very successful and daring by the Martin D, not that we are in favor of marijuana use, but if you do not have the ability to develop a true and autonomous thinking on the subject, always chase the consumer of substances that create a different state of consciousness due to fear and uncertainty that creates the unknown in some people. I wonder why the man does not call into question his own sobriety, as we know throughout history man has committed the worst atrocities, which have been made tactically and full use of the senses and in a where sobriety has prevailed in these decisions (NOTE: Must not sanity). Carlos